r/worldnews
•
u/dude_x
•
Feb 20 '23
•
2
1
1
1
1
1
Zelensky: If China allies itself with Russia, there will be world war Russia/Ukraine
https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-7321452.5k
u/rafikiknowsdeway1 Feb 20 '23
i'm not sure why China would want to? If Russia goes to shit isn't china first in line to start absorbing the pieces into satellite states?
821
u/Rotfled7 Feb 20 '23
Never mind the massive amounts of land ceded to Russia in the past two centuries
→ More replies201
u/Ok4940 Feb 20 '23
There you go CCP! You can expand as much as you want NORTH.
91
→ More replies30
→ More replies560
u/themightychris Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Russia collapsing would be a nightmare for China, they'll probably always do just enough to keep them propped up to avoid a swarm of unstable nuclear states in their backyard. One Russia that has its own substates locked down and is locked into keeping China happy is an ideal situation for them
190
u/IMM_Austin Feb 20 '23
Russia collapsing is a nightmare for the world. Won't just be China propping them up. Nuclear states are unstable in everyone's backyard
→ More replies→ More replies247
u/sakezaf123 Feb 20 '23
Yeah. The thing about Russia, is no matter what, we can't allow it to collapse. The world's largest nuclear arsenal, just really doesn't pair well with oligarchs, and warlords looking to be the next guy who reunites Russia, or just willing to sell them to anyone.
346
Feb 20 '23
[deleted]
149
u/JusticiarRebel Feb 20 '23
And it was a concern back then too. It's why there was a push to get Ukraine to give up its nuclear arsenal.
→ More replies100
u/PureLock33 Feb 20 '23
Which it did under the guise that Russia agrees never to invade Ukraine. Funny that part.
→ More replies→ More replies78
u/ManfredsJuicedBalls Feb 20 '23
Then again, it collapsed into 15 “manageable” states, with one of them pretty much assuming the mantle the USSR once had, if with less territory. Any collapse of said state would more than likely mean tons of small states run by warlords more than likely.
73
u/UCSlow Feb 20 '23
The Caucuses will be tearing each other apart within weeks of the collapse. It’s already started with Azerbaijan picking at neighbor states using Turkish tech over “cultural differences.”
→ More replies7
→ More replies75
u/MrCookie2099 Feb 20 '23
A dozen Balkanized states that don't want to bother with the upkeep of nuclear weapons and looking for some foreign aid and defense guarantees are probably more easy to negotiate nuclear disarmament than the current Russian Federation.
→ More replies
1.1k
u/Davis1891 Feb 20 '23
More like cold war v.2.
387
u/tastiefreeze Feb 20 '23
Room temperature war
→ More replies127
→ More replies7
3.3k
u/Zlimness Feb 20 '23
Maybe not a world war, but the majority of countries in the world has condemned Russia's illegal invasion and annexation of Ukrainian territories at the UN assembly. China abstained meaning they're neutral. If they start supplying Russia with weapons, they're not neutral anymore and join the ranks of Belarus, Syria, Nicaragua and North Korea. Not exactly the heavy hitters in their regions.
So China should consider if it's really worth trading most of the world for this crew.
782
u/NicoTheUniqe Feb 20 '23
The question is, what would happend to China if they did?
Say 400 Type 69 tanks arrived in Russia and was used on the front. What would the world do?
→ More replies1.0k
u/mimdrs Feb 20 '23
Well, if that were to happen and the West did a freeze in trade...it'd be a hell of a lot worse for China than people realize.
They are food dependent on the United States....
People always talk about their manufacturing or owning of debt....
But forget that none of that really matters when you people are starving.
If push comes to shove...it'd end badly without a single bullet needed.
708
u/Fandorin Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
I'm a banker with some knowledge of debt and default. If the US sanctions China, the US Treasury will be forbidden to service Chinese held US debt. China trying to unload it to third parties would cause those parties to violate sanctions and is fairly trivial to track. China holding US debt is a double edged sword that's definitely worse for China in an actual war. It'll be similar to the Russian reserve freezing and will hurt quite a bit.
→ More replies258
u/poster4891464 Feb 20 '23
At the same time what effect would this have to the trustworthiness of the US govt in the eyes of others?
→ More replies416
u/Fandorin Feb 20 '23
That's the hard question. There was a funny event back in 2008 when US Treasuries got downgraded. The result was that yields went down instead of up, because investors thought that if the US is downgraded, the rest of the world is surely fucked. So, the answer is that it's unprecedented and we have no idea which way it'll go. But, if the US is in trouble, so is the entire global financial system.
→ More replies147
u/LehmanParty Feb 20 '23
Yeah that was the trouble during 2020 as well. US equities and USD held strong because the US economy was the prettiest horse in the glue factory. It's still just about the only good place to defensively place assets, especially if you think China could rugpull the Cayman ADRs which is about the only way a US citizen can invest in them outside of their bonds
→ More replies51
u/Fandorin Feb 20 '23
I absolutely fucking love your user name.
→ More replies23
u/LehmanParty Feb 20 '23
Haha thanks. I've wanted to change it because it was a joke but now it's established and I'm stuck with it
56
u/UAreACoolCat Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Not entirely thanks to Trump: “The United States used to be China's largest agricultural supplier, but its position weakened following the U.S.-China trade war in 2018. In 2021, Brazil replaced the United States as China's largest agricultural supplier, providing 20 percent of China's agricultural imports”
Also they are the worlds largest grain producer
→ More replies182
u/lithuanian_potatfan Feb 20 '23
They didn't sanction or stop food trade with russia, they wouldn't with China either
→ More replies58
u/picardo85 Feb 20 '23
They didn't sanction or stop food trade with russia, they wouldn't with China either
funnily enough Russia did food sanction the EU when it came to imports. That happened in 2014 already. If you will sanction yourself, then your adversary don't need to put sanctions on you.
Why do I know this? I'm finnish and those russian sanctions hit the finnish food and dairy industry HARD!
Western russia was basically dependent on finnish products due to the shit quality of domestic products (they are still shit but that's the only option they have now, but in larger quantities).
→ More replies→ More replies40
u/dieortin Feb 20 '23
it’d be a hell of a lot worse for China than people realize
It’d be a hell of a lot worse for the US than people realize too. Literally everything is made there, or needs something that is made there.
→ More replies139
u/entechad Feb 20 '23
China siding with this band of misfits would be like adding Ty Cobb to the Bad News Bears.
35
52
60
u/poster4891464 Feb 20 '23
At the same time most of the world's population is represented by governments which have *not* condemned Russia (China, India, Brazil, Turkey, etc.) and continue to purchase energy from them.
→ More replies→ More replies30
u/Spottyblock Feb 20 '23
Majority of the world is still friendly/neutral with Russia apart from the West.
→ More replies
19.9k
u/Street-Badger
Feb 20 '23
•
We need to stop buying Chinese shit.
Sent from my iPhone
5.0k
Feb 20 '23
[deleted]
1.5k
u/Gooner71 Feb 20 '23
Vietnam 2
1.7k
u/Snaz5 Feb 20 '23
this time we're fighting WITH Vietnam
1.3k
u/Alphabunsquad Feb 20 '23
US has a decent habit of making friends with its former enemies, and also making enemies with its former friends.
887
u/Terrible-Dimension79 Feb 20 '23
Guten Tag friends.
883
u/cesrage Feb 20 '23 •
![]()
The real friends are the enemies we made along the way.
→ More replies231
u/Lostinthestarscape Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Our enemies now are the friends we made of our enemies' enemies then. Now we're working with our former friends' enemies' enemy... our friend.
It's simple geopolitics.
-Someone about Iran surely
→ More replies79
u/TheTreesHaveRabies Feb 20 '23
I hate these math problems, it's all about making the order of operations unclear. Either way, imma say 4.
→ More replies24
u/Theesismyphoneacc Feb 20 '23
God damn, it really does get exposed as a pussy ass little logic problem when you just throw a 4 at it like that
→ More replies165
u/not_SCROTUS Feb 20 '23
Ohayō Gozaimasu
→ More replies102
→ More replies59
29
82
u/BenjaminHamnett Feb 20 '23
Some friends become enemies, some enemies become friends? At the end your main character is richer from the experience?
→ More replies35
u/Keknath_HH Feb 20 '23
Sounds like. "Make your friends rich, your enemies rich and wait to see which is which" wait that's Tony Stark. Shit.
9
u/CaedenM Feb 20 '23
What are some examples of the US making enemies with its former friends? The only example I can think of that has lasted to the present day is the USSR after WW2.
→ More replies19
u/jdeo1997 Feb 20 '23
Ironically enough (and related to the USSR), Russia. Tsarist Russia was on good terms witht he US (iirc, it was good enough that, during the US civil war, they were prepared to start shit in Europe if Britain or France supported the confederacy), then it went downhill with the USSR, up and down during the cold war, and fairly friendly up till Georgia and Crimea, with Trump later sukxing an unfriendly-Russia's dick and, you know, now being a low point
→ More replies→ More replies5
146
u/iwastoldnottogohere Feb 20 '23
"I didn't expect special forces"
silent tree agreement
→ More replies64
u/MOOShoooooo Feb 20 '23
Henry Kissinger cracks a smile with an audible creak as the years of Nixon liver cirrhosis dust puffs into the air.
→ More replies284
u/PrrrromotionGiven1 Feb 20 '23
Little known event, after America pulled out of Vietnam, China invaded Vietnam because they thought the deal was that Vietnam would basically be their puppet after the Americans were gone (what with both being communist states in east asia) and the Vietnamese had other ideas. Vietnam clapped the force sent by China and they had the smarts to pull out after like a month rather than the years America spent trying to push Vietnam around. This remains the most recent war China has fought, if you want the last time China fought in a serious, long-term war you need to go all the way back to the Korean war.
193
u/EratosvOnKrete Feb 20 '23
china invaded vietnam to support the Khmer Rouge.
Vietnam invaded Cambodia to end the Khmer Rouge's attacks on Vietnam, and thats how the Cambodian genocide was discovered
→ More replies19
u/OfAnthony Feb 20 '23
Your forgetting one important part of the story- Russia. After that conflict the Russians request to lease Cam Ranh naval/air base. They are still there.
→ More replies15
u/leanaconda Feb 20 '23
It has been debated that the invasion was more of a show of force to retaliate for Vietnam's involvement in Cambodia, don't think China ever had plans to fully occupy Vietnam. Either way, both sides claimed victory.
59
u/Wowimatard Feb 20 '23
Thats not at all why they invaded tho.
China invaded Vietnam when Vietnam invaded Cambodia to stop Pol Pots massacre of Vietnamese villages in the border between cmabodia and Vietnam.
Cambodia/Pol Pot was supported by China at the time (Albeit they did not know that Pol Pot massacred Chinese cambodians at the time). And so sent in their army to try and stop Vietnams invasion.
73
u/teneggomelet Feb 20 '23
Yeah, in the US we didn't get to hear much about Vietnam stomping China to a draw in no time.
But ever since I went to Vietnam a few years back, I am not at all surprised. The Vietnamese are some of the biggest partiers AND some of the toughest MFs I've ever met.
Much like Ukranians seem to be.
→ More replies14
→ More replies88
u/FamousBear Feb 20 '23
Talking about the Chinese invasion of Vietnam but without any mention of context of Vietnam’s actions in Cambodia against the Khmer Rouge is a gross misrepresentation of facts
→ More replies95
u/Lem_201 Feb 20 '23
Vietnam had not so noble reasons to fight Khmer Rouge, but fuckers deserved everything they got.
65
u/MeatTornadoLove Feb 20 '23
SEA in 1960-1980 was a brutal fucking place.
25
u/leanaconda Feb 20 '23
Practically every place besides North America and Western Europe was a wild place during the cold war.
10
49
u/EratosvOnKrete Feb 20 '23
it was self defense. the Khmer Rouge would launch attacks on Vietnamese in Cambodia and in vietnam
30
u/unknownintime Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Colin Ferrell will be pleased.
Edit: no In Bruges fans I see.
→ More replies8
→ More replies27
54
→ More replies11
u/queernhighonblugrass Feb 20 '23
Electric uuuuuuh, you know, the thing we always say
→ More replies396
u/notbarrackobama Feb 20 '23
Or is it just final assembly so they can avoid made in china beinhg stamped on, despite 90% or whatever of the work being done in China
387
u/ghostinthewoods Feb 20 '23
I recall reading somewhere that a lot of businesses are getting fed up with Chinese companies stealing their (non Chinese businesses) shit and making knock offs for cheaper, so they're looking to bail out to places that might have slightly better protections for stuff like that. Not sure where I read that, though.
→ More replies254
u/Mrchristopherrr Feb 20 '23
There’s that and Zero Covid has made doing business in China a headache for the last few years. It’s hard to plan if the factory keeps getting quarantined and shut down every other month.
→ More replies130
u/MadNhater Feb 20 '23
It was zero covid that really pushed the move. China really fucked themselves. I still don’t understand that level of dumb. Like…anyone could have predicted this.
105
u/Flashy_War2097 Feb 20 '23
Probably rooted in vaccine conspiracy, China wanted their own vaccine and wouldn’t rely on international science so they wouldn’t be beholden to anyone. Yeah that worked out really well.
→ More replies47
→ More replies70
u/PseudoPhysicist Feb 20 '23
There's actually a very simple explanation: Cult of Personality.
It's the same reason Russia invaded Ukraine, despite it universally agreed upon to be a terrible move. Originally, people assumed that Ukraine would fall but the occupation would be hell. The occupation plus the international sanctions and pariah status would cripple Russia for decades to come. The near miraculous outcome instead was how bravely, effectively, and tenaciously the Ukrainians fought back. Not only was invading a bad move, it was made even worse because Russia couldn't even get any semblance of victory at all. They invaded a smaller country and absolutely made a fool of themselves. The Russian leadership painted a rosy picture of the outcome to their dear leader because they dared not say otherwise.
Same here. Dear Leader said this is the policy. Nobody disagrees. Policy starts failing. Instead of telling Dear Leader "This was a dumb move. Let's go back to the drawing board.", they say "The Policy is great! There's been some minor issues but we're confident we can solve it perfectly!"
And the Cult of Personality starts consuming itself and spiraling downwards. As much as we lament the inefficiency of democracy, the opposite (authoritarian dicatorships) is worse. If you're ever curious about the pitfalls of a Cult of Personality, look inside the government of Nazi Germany. Backstabbing. Backstabbing and Ass Kissing everywhere. Rather than trying to solve the nation's problems, all the officials were more concerned about how to screw over their nearest rivals and kissing ass of the one guy in power.
→ More replies26
u/admiralspark Feb 20 '23
We purchase large amounts of network switches, high-end communication devices for business computer networks. The vendor we buy from is an "American" company that's blatantly a Delaware LLC front for a Chinese manufacturer. All of the major manufacturers that make stuff in this space have some level of assembly in China, so we were concerned about the blanket USGovt bans on Chinese infrastructure purchases.
Well, we tore one open to check it out. Turns out the computer's internals were made in the US Midwest, then shipped to China, where this company bolts the good plus a power source into a nice aluminum chassis, slap a Made in China sticker on it and sell it for 1/10th the price of Cisco back to the US.
It is literally cheaper to purchase American robot-made electronics and use Chinese labor to put them in a fancy box to sell, than to assemble them in the US.
Until we fix that problem, businesses will not stop buying Chinese. I have worked for SMALL "medium" enterprises for the last decade and I've personally helped put $10m through their company, because my businesses couldn't afford to purchase American-branded solutions, even though the technology is the same.
→ More replies107
u/fluteofski- Feb 20 '23
I used to work in supply chain, and left about a year before the pandemic (thank god). This is exactly what’s going on.
Companies go to their Chinese suppliers, and say “hey we need to move final production To VN to avoid tariffs.” The Chinese companies say “it’s gonna cost more because we have to set up a new factory, and you have to ship an additional time to VN” and we say “ok… it’s cheaper than the tariff.”
So the Chinese company buys property, and erects a factory in VN. Staffs their management over there…. And ships parts for final assembly to their VN factory for that “made in Vietnam” sticker…. They don’t ship their chip manufacturing tools and machines because that (1) costs wayyyyy too much, and (2) VN doesn’t have a large enough skilled workforce to operate the machines. we also don’t have enough trusted suppliers already in VN to manufacture complex items for us.
This added extra complexity to supply chain, making it prime for collapse early in the pandemic.
China was ok with this, because they get to charge Americans more for things, it forced their factories to expand and buy large swaths of foreign land, and control foreign workforces. Economies became more dependent on China. It was wild to watch.
It’s economic imperialism.
→ More replies48
u/Yesiforgotmypassw0rd Feb 20 '23
Wasn’t it india? With 50% failed quality test so far ?
→ More replies87
u/cookingboy Feb 20 '23
China’s Vietnam’s second largest trade partner, and they just signed a bunch of cooperation deals: https://en.vietnamplus.vn/vietnam-china-sign-13-cooperation-documents/243037.amp
China and Vietnam’s relationship are the warmest it has been in years.
And Apple is diversifying its supply chain, they aren’t scaling down their Chinese operation. After all 20% of Apple’s revenue is from China. That’s not something Vietnam can replace.
→ More replies96
u/fortevnalt Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
Vietnamese here. Just wanna say things are quite complex and not that black and white. Don’t count on us to be instantly and wholeheartedly on the West’s side when ww3 breaks out.
→ More replies→ More replies36
u/atlantachicago Feb 20 '23
I have heard that China is buying up the manufacturing facilities in Viet Nam and Mexico that were meant to compete with them.
→ More replies20
u/Puzzleheaded_Fold466 Feb 20 '23
Yep exactly. I’m more familiar with apparel and garment and that’s what they did to bypass the export/import tariffs. Build/buy factories in bengladesh, Egypt, Vietnam, Mexico. Country changes but it’s still the same Chinese owners.
→ More replies381
u/FriendlyGuitard Feb 20 '23
Or you don't. China has a lot to lose in a World War if they are the world manufacturer.
Same as how Russia was EU gas provider and the war not only crippled them economically but remove them as critical power in the EU economy.
468
u/SteveRudzinski Feb 20 '23
Penn Jillete put it best, and maybe he was paraphrasing someone else I forget.
"Peace isn't everyone loves each other and hugs; peace is I have an axe but I'm not going to use it on you because you make blue jeans and I like blue jeans."
150
u/rugbyj Feb 20 '23
Mutually Assured Fits.
42
u/Oswald_Hydrabot Feb 20 '23
I like this idea. Weapons of Ass Construction?.. Something where jeans fit your ass so no war.
29
→ More replies8
21
u/yak-broker Feb 20 '23
'Course, it's not always that simple. The United Fruit Company is a, um, skinning example. And a lot of WW1
19
u/NeverShortedNoWhore Feb 20 '23
It is that simple. The United Fruit Company did not make blue jeans. That was a different Banana Republic.
→ More replies5
u/Mechasteel Feb 20 '23
United Fruit Company changed their name to Chiquita after people got upset about the whole banana republic thing.
→ More replies13
u/WriteBrainedJR Feb 20 '23
Peace is a temporary state of non-fighting, enforced by superior strength.
→ More replies11
u/Envect Feb 20 '23
It really doesn't need to be temporary. We have the tools and capability to distribute resources globally. We'd be better off using those resources productively rather than killing each other.
→ More replies7
u/nico_bico Feb 21 '23
We could end scarcity if we worked together better. Instead of spending trillions on military's budgets, we could be mining asteroids together and securing water sources on other planets
5
u/Envect Feb 21 '23
I think humanity is still crawling in the mud in terms of evolution. I think society is going to change drastically as the next stage. We've spent all these centuries conquering the planet. It's going to take a long time to adjust to a truly global society, but working together is just better for people.
How many people want anything more than to live their lives in peace? Of those outliers, how many of them are like that because of trauma? We can fix many of those people with the right understanding and policies. I think we could make the world a lot more relaxed if we spent generations working on it. Tall order, I know, but I'm hopeful for the far flung future. It's not like the world is going to get less interdependent.
→ More replies→ More replies45
u/obscure_greenleaf Feb 20 '23
China has a lot to lose in a World War
So do we!
51
u/Gen-Jinjur Feb 20 '23
Everyone loses in a world war, but the countries that have the most natural resources and the most distance from enemies tend to do better in the end.
→ More replies432
u/CaptainSluggo Feb 20 '23
Apple has begun moving its manufacturing out of China to places like Vietnam and India.
→ More replies→ More replies95
u/kidcrumb Feb 20 '23
We don't really buy Chinese shit. We buy American shit made in China.
You need to incentivize US Companies to do business elsewhere.
I think people are too quick to assume China wants war with the US. The U.S. gives jobs, economic stability, and a first world status to China with their business. It wouldnt make any sense to upset that apple cart.
→ More replies83
u/OldHuntersNeverDie Feb 20 '23
You buy American, Korean and Japanese shit made in China, not just American. Actually you probably have more Korean and Japanese designed electronics than you do American designed electronics in your home. That's not even mentioning cars.
31
u/Pkock Feb 20 '23
I work at company that makes car parts, lots in China. It is now extremely common when I am setting up sourcing for an OEM equivalent replacement part, I will find out the Chinese factory our agents found is also straight up making the OEM part. I even had a supplier try to fill my order with a batch from the OEM with part numbers and a logo lasered on it.
The final assembly may be Japan, Canada, US, or Mexico, but your subcomponents are largely Chinese.
→ More replies
405
u/KBVan21 Feb 20 '23
Say what you want about the Chinese politically etc. but they ain’t stupid.
Their economy is heavily linked to the West’s consumerism. Direct conflict with NATO nations and/or other western allies would cease that trade. Can call China communist as much as people like but they sure as hell benefit and work within capitalist parameters just like everyone else.
When the chips are down, they wouldn’t go in 100% for Russia as it’s an unnecessary conflict for them.
They would be in much better shape remaining in their current status quo of continuing their trade with western nations whilst giving limited support to Russia to appease their alliance.
48
u/SouthernUpstate Feb 21 '23
Exactly. China is just state-run capitalism, which is not communism.
→ More replies→ More replies33
u/JayR_97 Feb 20 '23
If I was China id just stay out of it and then buy everything up when Russia collapses.
→ More replies5
166
u/Jws0209 Feb 20 '23
i been waiting to spend all these bottlecaps i been saving up might get me a Fatman
→ More replies
6.5k
u/well_uh_yeah Feb 20 '23
People throw "World War" around too often for my tastes.
608
u/MrPielil Feb 20 '23
I quite frankly will not be participating
→ More replies293
u/TJR843 Feb 20 '23
Same. I'm not going to die for the rich.
27
u/JestersHat Feb 20 '23
You're welcome to come to my underground cabin in Norway to chill and smoke weed if you do your part in farming food 😉
→ More replies5
156
u/ANGRY_TURTLE_ARRGH Feb 20 '23
Right? Fuck all that. I'll be the crazy mountain guy that didn't know the war ended 20 years ago.
34
u/We_are_stardust23 Feb 20 '23
Sign me up. I'm not very skilled but I'm a quick learner
12
6
u/alejandra_candelaria Feb 21 '23
Guys can I join and we teach each other survival skills or do I have to get another mountain?
→ More replies7
u/Throwmedownthewell0 Feb 21 '23
Government: "It is now illegal to not die for the rich."
→ More replies14
2.0k
u/FGM_148_Javelin Feb 20 '23
This guy just met the with president literally an hour before making this statement
→ More replies1.2k
u/ptbus0 Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
And given how calculated the US is I bet Biden's inner monologue said something along the lines of "Owww slow down there
hossman."883
u/News_Account45 Feb 20 '23
“Now wait just a minute, Jack…”
165
→ More replies242
u/GarbagePailGrrrl Feb 20 '23
Listen here fat
→ More replies51
u/CBBuddha Feb 20 '23
C’mon, fat. Listen, fat. Well I’m just a southern boy and down here in the south we do things a little differently.
→ More replies332
u/tapiringaround Feb 20 '23
Or by having Ukraine say it after the meeting instead of the US it’s putting the idea out there without the US itself drawing that line in the sand. Zelenskyy saying it is a warning, Biden saying it is a threat. But the US could very well want that warning out there.
19
u/Nothingaddsup Feb 20 '23
But the fact of the matter is no one is risking nuclear war over this conflict.
If the US and China were to enter in earnest there is something else at play
→ More replies93
u/astral34 Feb 20 '23
And it’s perfectly consistent with what Blinken said in Munich.
The US is trying to draw a line regarding Chinese military aid but I doubt it’s going to work. I just don’t see the west sanctioning China the way Belarus is.
I do think it could mean fighter jets and long range missiles, or at least a significant increase in aid
→ More replies→ More replies6
u/snodgee Feb 20 '23
zelensky was telling us we needed to shoot down russian planes like week 1. dude wants us to be all in.
→ More replies531
u/Sens1r Feb 20 '23
It's a weird statement in the context of this war, Ukraine doesn't have the power to make this a world war and I doubt the US is gunning for one.
→ More replies590
Feb 20 '23 edited Apr 29 '23
[deleted]
→ More replies372
u/majnuker Feb 20 '23
"Some damn fool thing in the Balkans'
Minor entities causing a domino effect of obligatory war is quite common in history.
→ More replies29
116
u/Virtual-Public-4750 Feb 20 '23
Dear governments of the world,
What the hell is wrong with you?
Sincerely, the people you screw over.
→ More replies43
u/brucebrowde Feb 21 '23
Dear plebes of the world,
Who the hell cares about you?
Sincerely, pick any government
→ More replies
99
u/HumanShadow Feb 20 '23
Well they need Russian oil because we've got them in tight spots in the south China see and Taiwan. China needs that new Silk Road and pipeline. China just needs to keep half-heartedly supporting Russia because they still need Russia.
5
u/TikkoBit Feb 21 '23
China just needs to keep half-heartedly supporting Russia because they still need Russia.
they want to be as close to Russia as they can while putting on a show about not wanting to 100% finance everything Russia needs to kill as many people in EU as possible. "China is just so reluctant!", they ain't, from start of the war to this day they have been helping Russia any way they can while bullshitting everyone who accuses them of that. "No, we totally don't like war and don't care for Russia's ambitions even thought we have the exact same ambitions!", and your weather balloons totally by accident keep plying in to other countries too. China wants more control in EU too.. they have been buying and financing everything they can there same as in US and Canada and half of Africa. If Russia is trying to destabilize shit in EU that's great and that is a cause every asshole in China can get behind because long term it's going to benefit them.
→ More replies
515
u/indiyeahn Feb 20 '23
No, there won't be a world war, but Ukraine will have the most to lose in that situation.
China has a lot of World war era ammunition stockpiles compatible with Soviet equipment, and just having those can turn the tide in favour of Russia by a lot.
→ More replies302
u/skittlesmcgee33 Feb 20 '23
Problem is if China gets involved, the west has no choice but to apply sanctions. But by applying sanctions, the west weakens it's ability to threaten retribution for Taiwan. If the west is already levying sanctions, fuck it might as well start the invasion. Then you have a very destabilized world.
181
u/Spottyblock Feb 20 '23
And that would collapse the world economy. China isn’t like Russia, the West relies too much on China.
→ More replies235
u/shorty0820 Feb 20 '23
And China on the west. China gets the vast majority of their populations food from the west. No need to fire shots if you’re starving population begins to revolt
151
u/TapeDelayBrain Feb 20 '23
Globalization has basically saved us from word war 3
→ More replies168
u/skittlesmcgee33 Feb 20 '23
They said the same shit in 1914 and 1939. Not saying it’s the same, but the “we’re a global economy now - no one’s gonna wreck their economy for war” argument is at least 100 years old. If the autocrats think they can form a new world order with them on top then they’ll stomach whatever short term pain they need to.
21
u/oby100 Feb 20 '23
We’ve learned our lesson. Take a look at the billions the US gives out in aid to all sorts of random countries around the world.
The US props up shaky states to ensure stability so that no state is motivated to go on the war path. There’s an insane amount of work that goes into making large scale war unattractive, which is why it’s so shocking that Russia would invade Ukraine. It’s hard to imagine, even if they successfully captured the country in a couple months, how it could ever be worth it.
→ More replies73
u/BleuRaider Feb 20 '23
The world’s economic system, supply chains, and interwoven industries are completely different than before both WW1 and WW2. It is not the same by any stretch of the imagination.
→ More replies40
→ More replies34
u/Happy-Mousse8615 Feb 20 '23
Food maybe, but China has been calorie self-sufficient for a while now. That was one of Xi's big objectives.
→ More replies→ More replies14
u/jessquit Feb 20 '23
Problem is if China gets involved, the west has no choice but to apply sanctions
Well, no. There's always a choice involved.
→ More replies
98
u/JhymnMusic Feb 20 '23
The military industry is salivating at the mouth. 'shucky dang darn. We don't want war but no choice. Oh well'
→ More replies31
176
232
u/443319 Feb 20 '23
The only people that want war are political leaders and those that will benefit from it through greed, profit and greater control.
I just want peace, and I am sure most of the population globally would agree with this desire.
→ More replies6
u/123_alex Feb 20 '23
Everybody wants peace but for some people peace means getting Ukraine. And then maybe the Baltics. While at it, maybe a bit more and this is why we cannot have nice things.
73
245
u/gregaustex Feb 20 '23 edited Feb 20 '23
I get that Zelensky is very circumstantially "our guy" but not all of his propaganda is news, nor would his opinions on worldwide political dynamics normally be interesting to anyone.
China isn't going to ally with Russia, I expect they're going to let them break themselves on Ukraine and when it's over try to make them a Satellite State by propping up their ruined economy.
79
u/cashmoneyhash Feb 20 '23
I 100% agree with you. The guy isn't in a position to decide the fate of the entire world.
→ More replies68
43
u/xratedcheese Feb 20 '23
WWIII wouldn't profit China, but selling stuff to Russia so Russia can wear down the US and Europe over a long and fruitless war might seem like a good idea to Xi Jinping, considering that the US and Europe are also likely to keep buying from China.
→ More replies
574
u/AllergicTOredditors Feb 20 '23
I'm pretty sure China and Russia are already allies and have been for a long time
539
u/krazycrypto Feb 20 '23
Not quite. They had bumpy border disputes between each other tens of years ago. There is a lingering distrust between the two in the older generations.
13
u/NaCly_Asian Feb 20 '23
The land disputes generally involve the area around Vladivostok, taken from China during the weak Qing Dynasty. After the PRC stabilized in the 50s, Mao brought up the issue with Khrushchev, asking that he acknowledge that Russia during the Imperial days were assholes. He didn't even really want the land back. During the Soviet-Sino split, it led to border conflicts in the area, and if the rumors are to be believed, the Soviets planned on using nukes against China after their attempts to cause trouble in the NE and Xinjiang failed.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, the new Russian Federation signed some agreement with China to put an end to the dispute. As for the older generation, the KMT supporters do feel that Siberia was stolen from China. And some of the older members of the CPC probably still remember the nuclear threats. But for now, I doubt there is any real interest in conflict.
→ More replies→ More replies256
u/JimmyBags2 Feb 20 '23
Unfortunately most people have no knowledge about any of those things — you know, history stuff.
124
5
u/frontera_power Feb 20 '23
Unfortunately most people have no knowledge about any of those things — you know, history stuff.
Just because they had a conflict in the past, doesn't mean they won't cooperate in 2023 for mutual interests.
→ More replies5
u/pekki Feb 20 '23
Umm Russia and China are having joint exercises just now. https://www.npr.org/2023/02/18/1158169215/south-africa-joins-russia-and-china-in-naval-exercises
49
u/Half_Man1 Feb 20 '23
Isn’t it more that China has neutral standing with Russia but see potential economic boons for them here? Like buying up Russian oil while it’s on discount.
→ More replies121
u/zjm555 Feb 20 '23
They dislike each other, in fact. But their number one adversary is the US / NATO, so they could overlook their distaste for one another to unite against us.
→ More replies→ More replies59
u/Snaz5 Feb 20 '23
they don't hate each other as much as others hate them, but they aren't allies in the same way that, like, Canada and America are allies
→ More replies
4
13
u/updn Feb 20 '23
No shit, Sherlock. But China has been around for 3000 years and has no reason to do so
→ More replies
7.6k
u/Ok-Chip835 Feb 20 '23
The Wang guy is in Moscow now according to China.